Dr. Haviland’s A Silence That Kills and Florence King’s I’d Rather Smok

Do you smoke? Such a question has been asked to most people at one time or another. The topic of smoking certainly requires a thorough analysis, whether you smoke or not. It’s also an issue which seems to polarize people. In this reading we’ll compare contrasting viewpoints by two different individuals. As I present the arguments, I’ll dissect them to truly understand their inner-workings. Both Dr. Haviland and King touch on many subjects yet seem to ignore others. I think a balance must be struck when it comes to smoking, both through individual rights and a social responsibility. â€Å"I’d Rather Smoke than Kiss.† is Florence King’s very astute retort to anti-smokers. In this writing she advocates for smoking as a simple enjoyable thing to do. To emphasize this she recalls her first smoking experience, which is for the most part very normal and unexciting. However, this inconsequential account is not indicative of the rest of the story. King quickly switches gears as she goes on the attack. In the first section she labels hatred of smokers as a form of misanthropy which she goes on to say is â€Å"the most popular form of closet misanthropy in America today† (King 32). This perspective is further augmented by the fact that she considers second-hand smoke an invention; a means for the â€Å"Passive Americans† (King 32), to justify prejudice towards smokers. As she moves into the second section, she begins to document the hostility shown to smokers. Through her own personal interactions or through examples she views in newspaper articles. King really focuses on the subject of public perception, and while some of the examples validate her perspective, others do not. We see this in her response to a Washington Post article, i... ...r someone to quit. Instead of creating ads with the intent purpose to ostracize smokers, we should instead make ads to inform them. The smoking issue is very complicated and some of the arguments are beyond the scope of this essay. Still, we can obtain a balanced outlook if we consider the following: the facts of smoking, individual right, societal responsibility, and the stigma of smoking. Haviland and King write essays which contain very important points, but seem to contain a bias which may alienate some people. To truly reach a consensus on the smoking issue, we must be willing to meet each other halfway. We must strike equilibrium between individual right and societal responsibility. Works Cited King, Martin Luther, Jr. â€Å"I Have a Dream.† Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Adam Whitehurst. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2014. 687-690. Print.

Cheating Quotes Essay

Evidence 1. â€Å"There is too much competition between students, which leads to increased pressure to do well. Cheating becomes a way to get the edge over the other students in the class. In addition, the penalties for getting caught are mild.† 2. â€Å"Today there is more pressure placed on students to do well. They are expected to receive good grades, play a sport, and volunteer if they are to be looked at by a good college. With a B tainting your transcript, a college might not look at you.† 3. â€Å"Students who would usually cheat get sucked into believing it is the only way to get ahead in school: If the cheaters are doing better then they are and not getting caught, then they had better try it.† 4. â€Å"Schools are drifting away from emphasizing learning and are emphasizing the grade instead. When the thirst for knowledge is replenished in the students mind, the desire for the grade without the work will dissolve. Only then will cheating decline.† Commentary 1. Wenke is indicating that the competition to get better grades has increased, and the only way for the students to stay in the competition is to cheat. She also says that because of the competition the pressure increased which causes the students stress, which then pushes them towards cheating. The students have no fear of cheating because the penalties will not affect them or there grades in a major way. 2. Wenke is trying to show us that now education is based around getting good grades and doing well and not about getting a good education and learning. She also is saying that colleges are looking for students with better grades and people with more extracurricular activities and with out A grades colleges may not even look at your transcript. 3. Wenke is telling us that cheating is the only way students can achieve success in school. Some students try their hardest to get the best grade they can achieve, but then see that the cheaters that put in less effort and get better grades. This makes more students want to cheat because that way you could focus on other things and not only schoolwork. So Wenke is saying what is stopping the good students from trying to cheat if the cheaters are prospering while they are not. 4. Wenke is indicating that cheating will only decline if knowledge is a greater quality for students rather than getting a better grade. If all the students want only knowledge and the grades do not affect their education then there will not be as much cheating as there is now. So the end of cheating will only occur if students care more about knowledge instead of grades.

The Code Of Ethics, And The Environment That Is Safe And...

As God has paved the way for our lives, teachers must pave the way for learning to be possible for every student. A well-designed plan will include strategies for all learning styles, assessing prior knowledge, and an environment that is safe and promotes learning. Teachers have the knowledge to research and apply what is need for successful student accomplishments by instructional strategies, assessment plans, standards/objectives to be mastered, learning outcomes, data from test tallies, self-evaluation or reflection on the day to day practices, the code of ethics, and administration roles to make responsible decisions on the accountability for each student. Teachers are the disciples of Christ. Their lives must model and reflect God†¦show more content†¦Of course, no teaching strategy is foolproof and plain good teaching should remedy many of potential ills, just as good teaching can make more traditional teacher-led ‘direct instruction wholly engaging and effect ive (Huntingenglish, 2013). In order to use these strategies, a teacher must know what they are, why to use them, and what knowledge is gained by using those methods. Group work accelerates learning, gives deep concepts and motivates the students to learn the concept. Critical thinking is the goal. Instructors can ask different kinds and levels of questions, which engages the entire class and allows quiet students to answer a question without having to stand out from their classmates (Barkley, Cross, Major, 2005). This strategy is very easy to incorporate into a lesson. It is about adding depth to ideas, stimulating debate and collaborative thinking (Huntingenglish, 2013). The concept attainment strategy has many components. First, the teacher will describe the purpose of the lesson. Then state the rules of the student interaction by providing a focus statement to help the students concentrate on a specific area. Next, the students will define the attributes of the examples . Together the teacher and students will test the understanding of the concept. Finally, the students will label the concept and debrief or unpack thoughts (Kaur, 2009). If the components are followed the students will make connections between what